Dawn of Heat Engine Science

   Previous Next

Year 1800 - Heat was thought to be a fluid that inhabited all matter. Heat was not consumed, it "fell" and "fallen" heat had to be drained away.
Basically, heat is an imponderable material, like a fluid, and just like water from a water wheel, it must have a way to flow out of an engine, or just like a water wheel in a hole, it would fill up with heat fluid and stop doing work without a drain.


water wheel

Courtesy Florida Center for Instructional Technology Clipart ETC

The "Water wheel" model of heat engines.

Note: Both Kelvin and Carnot, The authors of the cited works, expressed doubts whether the "heat is an imponderable indestructible fluid" model properly explained available experimental data at the time "Reflections on the Motive Power of Heat” was being written. The fluid model was ultimately supplanted as the dominant paradigm by modeling heat as molecular motion just twenty years later. The "motion" model of heat has stood the test of time through the present day.

How Very Quaint!

In "Reflections on the Motive Power of Heat" by Sadi Carnot (approx 1820 in French, 1897 English), and "An Account of Carnot's Theory" by Sir William Thomson (better known as Lord Kelvin) (Kelvin scale anyone?) Thanks to www.archive.org for pdf of original scan (Cited as "Reflections" for brevity hereafter). English translation of "Reflections" along with Lord Kelvin's added work published 1897.

Pg 46 (Carnot)

  The production of motive power is then due in
  steam-engines not to an actual consumption of
  caloric, but to its transportation from a warm
  body to a cold body, that is, to its re-establishment
  of equilibrium an equilibrium considered as destroyed
  by any cause whatever, by chemical action
  such as combustion, or by any other. We shall
  see shortly that this principle is applicable to
  any machine set in motion by heat.
  According to this principle, the production of
  heat alone is not sufficient to give birth to the
  impelling power: it is necessary that there should
  also be cold; without it, the heat would be useless.
  
  According to this principle, the production of
  heat alone is not sufficient to give birth to the
  impelling power: it is necessary that there should
  also be cold; without it, the heat would be useless.
  And in fact, if we should find about us
  only bodies as hot as our furnaces, how can we
  condense steam ? What should we do with it if
  once produced ? We should not presume that we
  might discharge it into the atmosphere, as is done
  
  (pg 47) 
in some engines;* the atmosphere would not receive it. It does receive it under the actual condition of things, only because it fulfils the office of a vast condenser, because it is at a lower temperature; otherwise it would soon become fully charged, or rather would be already saturated,

Paraphrased (Carnot) Heat is not consumed, but must flow to cold to produce motion.

Pg 60 (Carnot)

  According to established principles at the present
  time, we can compare with sufficient accuracy the
  motive power of heat to that of a waterfall. Each
  has a maximum that we cannot exceed, whatever
  may be, on the one hand, the machine which is
  acted upon by the water, and whatever, on the
  other hand, the substance acted upon by the heat.
  The motive power of a waterfall depends on its
  height and on the quantity of the liquid; the
  motive power of heat depends also on the quantity
  of caloric used, and on what may be termed, on
  what in fact we will call, the height of its fall,
  that is to say, the difference of temperature of the
  bodies between which the exchange of caloric is
  made. In the waterfall the motive power is exactly
  proportional to the difference of level between
  the higher and lower reservoirs. In the fall of
  caloric the motive power undoubtedly increases
  with the difference of temperature between the
  warm and the cold bodies ; but we do not know
  whether it is proportional to this difference. We
  do not know, for example, whether the fall of caloric
  from 100 to 50 degrees furnishes more or less
  motive power than the fall of this same caloric from
  50 to zero. It is a question which we propose to
  examine hereafter.

Paraphrased (Carnot) The amount of work you get depends on "height of its fall".

Pg 191 (Kelvin)

54. In the use of water-wheels for motive power,
  the economy of the engine depends not only upon
  the excellence of its adaptation for actually transmitting
  any given quantity of water through it,
  and producing the equivalent of work, but upon
  turning to account the entire available fall; so, as
  we are taught by Carnot, the object of a thermodynamic
  engine is to economize in the best possible
  way the transference of all the heat evolved, from
  bodies at the temperature of the source, to bodies
  at the lowest temperature at which the heat can be
  discharged. With reference, then, to any engine of
  the kind, there will be two points to be considered:
  (1) The extent of the fall utilized.
  (2) The economy of the engine, with the fall
  which it actually uses.

Paraphrased (Kelvin) The amount of work you get depends on how much the heat "falls".